Authors: Minerva Das, Dr. Sujit Kumar Acharya
Abstract: Modern hiring practices increasingly incorporate interactive game-style mechanisms to evaluate talent and gauge candidate readiness for the workplace. Tools like scenario-based simulations, structured quizzes, and competitive scoring systems allow recruiters to measure practical capabilities directly rather than relying solely on traditional resume screenings. This empirical study investigates how job applicants perceive various gamified selection methods, focusing on their effectiveness in assessing essential workplace skills and supporting graduate employability. Data were gathered from 104 participants—including higher education students, active job seekers, and industry professionals—using a standardized survey instrument. Statistical analysis using percentage distributions, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple linear regression reveals a strong candidate preference for simulations and task-oriented quizzes, which respondents associated with clearer skill demonstration and higher engagement. Conversely, technical barriers, unclear instructions, and fairness concerns emerged as primary impediments. The findings indicate that while gamified hiring offers a reliable avenue for evaluating candidate competencies, its success in closing the graduate employability gap hinges on deliberate tool design, transparent evaluation criteria, and alignment with academic training.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23494082
